MEDUSA-DOCU-:-Rivers.md

@@ -118,11 +118,13 @@ first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files
 <img src="uploads/0583ccd90f5e2fb294626a0adc958ddc/image.png" width=49%>   
 <img src="uploads/b4ace1fc3265be5248ea5b1050d2aec2/image.png" width=49%>           
   The difference decrease in `LS400`, but the interesting bit here, is that we loose DIC compare to the `no-river` run, although we add the river nutrients...         
-   Looking at the river, we might understand what's going on :     
-   Here `LS200`:    
+   Looking at the river, we might understand what's going on :         
+   Here `LS200`:
 
 <img src="uploads/21b7054deefbdae89b3eaf6395662829/image.png" width=49%>
 <img src="uploads/d627423cc33edc7804850527fdaa68de/image.png" width=49%>
   
   The problem seems to come from the mismatch between DIN and DIC riverine inputs.  PP is boosted by the N supply, where no DIC is added and where fresh water arrives. DIC is driven down by the PP, and probably bellow 0.0 because of the fresh water and advection.      
-I am doing another test with add mixing at river mouth down to 20m instead of 10, but best might be to make sure both DIN and DIC river input match.
\ No newline at end of file
+I am doing another test with add mixing at river mouth down to 20m instead of 10, but best might be to make sure both DIN and DIC river input match. 
+* Increasing the river mixing did not work (the mathy is not much deeper than 15m around the river mouth, so... no big surprise here, unfortunately. 
+* Widening the `DIN` and `SIL` riverine inputs (LS400 for them too) might lower the PP down and help pass the failing point. but best solution to test is the co-locate the `DIC` and `ALK` with the `DIN` in inputs.
\ No newline at end of file