Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
M MEDUSA_4.2.x
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Commits
Collapse sidebar
  • acc
  • MEDUSA_4.2.x
  • Wiki
  • MEDUSA DOCU : Rivers

MEDUSA DOCU : Rivers · Changes

Page history
Update MEDUSA DOCU : Rivers authored Nov 22, 2024 by julpal's avatar julpal
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 23 additions and 3 deletions
+23 -3
  • MEDUSA-DOCU-:-Rivers.md MEDUSA-DOCU-:-Rivers.md +23 -3
  • No files found.
MEDUSA-DOCU-:-Rivers.md
View page @ 1bd64453
......@@ -103,6 +103,26 @@ first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files
With river, the total production in 1986 is of 31 Pg-C per y still too low for our liking. this will need some tweaking.
* Trying to Understand why it is failing there, in the Chinese sea...
* I've tried 1 run with all Andrew's new LS200 files (let's call it `LS200`)
* and also 1run where i've switched `DIC` and `ALK` to the widerly spreaded LS400 (so let's call it `LS400`).
Both failed. `LS400` few days later though.
\ No newline at end of file
* and also 1run where i've switched `DIC` and `ALK` to the widerly spreaded LS400 (so let's call it `LS400`).
Both failed. `LS400` few days later though.
An interesting point is that the model ran with no river nutrients, in both advection scheme. What means that something in the river induces the crash.
The DIC field in the `no_river` run (fct advection) looks like this :
<img src="uploads/681ad9fee40424c0bf4401cb1a9d81e4/image.png" width=49%>
The difference with here is the diff with respectively `LS200` and `LS400` bellow.
<img src="uploads/5a6d4c51dd7da71bf1d6e443cfac97de/image.png" width=49%>
<img src="uploads/5ffeab748e149f99aeb8942cf20a7dbd/image.png" width=49%>
<img src="uploads/0583ccd90f5e2fb294626a0adc958ddc/image.png" width=49%>
<img src="uploads/b4ace1fc3265be5248ea5b1050d2aec2/image.png" width=49%>
The difference decrease in `LS400`, but the interesting bit here, is that we loose DIC compare to the `no-river` run, although we add the river nutrients...
Looking at the river, we might understand what's going on :
Here `LS200`:
<img src="uploads/21b7054deefbdae89b3eaf6395662829/image.png" width=49%>
<img src="uploads/d627423cc33edc7804850527fdaa68de/image.png" width=49%>
The problem seems to come from the mismatch between DIN and DIC riverine inputs. PP is boosted by the N supply, where no DIC is added and where fresh water arrives. DIC is driven down by the PP, and probably bellow 0.0 because of the fresh water and advection.
I am doing another test with add mixing at river mouth down to 20m instead of 10, but best might be to make sure both DIN and DIC river input match.
\ No newline at end of file
Clone repository
  • Compile MEDUSA from scratch
  • Developing on MEDUSA git Best practice
  • How to SETTE test MEDUSA.
  • How to run MEDUSA 1D on ARCHER2 and ANEMONE
  • How to run on ANEMONE
  • How to run on ARCHER2
  • MEDUSA DOCU : Chl light
  • MEDUSA DOCU : Rivers
  • MEDUSA Guide some useful explanations
  • MEDUSA NEMO4.2
  • MEDUSA Training How to run MEDUSA 1D ( on NOC linux system)
  • Home
  • todo_list