... | ... | @@ -13,14 +13,25 @@ First, the code itself does what we want. just fixed 3 bugs : |
|
|
|
|
|
first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files.
|
|
|
* tested 1 by 1 seems to come from the N river inputs. but all fields show high values in some specific river mouth, of which some in the Arctic look present very high values (here some example after 5month):
|
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|
those results are when using the files :
|
|
|
river42_total_ALK_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
|
|
|
river42_total_DIC_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
|
|
|
river42_tot_N_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
|
|
|
river42_tot_Si_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
|
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|
those results are when using the files :
|
|
|
* river42_total_ALK_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
|
|
|
* river42_total_DIC_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
|
|
|
* river42_tot_N_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
|
|
|
* river42_tot_Si_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
|
|
|
* maybe the we can try with LS 400? here a diff:
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
Running the LS 400 river nutrients did not solve the problem.
|
|
|
* Andrew added made some special treatment to the Ob fjord in the Russian Arctic.
|
|
|

|
|
|
it didn't Solve the problem.
|
|
|
* I've them re-run the last rivers, spreading the nutrients down to 70m deep (max) instead of 10m earlier.
|
|
|

|
|
|
Still no Luck.
|
|
|
* Looking at the bathy, spreading the river nutrients down to 70m won't make a difference in the Arctic...
|
|
|

|
|
|
As the sea-floor stands between 8 and 15m deep around there...
|
|
|
* Last hope LS400 with special Ob treatment. |