Skip to content

GitLab

MEDUSA DOCU : Rivers · Changes

Page history
Update MEDUSA DOCU : Rivers authored by julpal's avatar julpal
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 21 additions and 10 deletions
MEDUSA-DOCU-:-Rivers.md
View page @ 2511a04e
...@@ -13,14 +13,25 @@ First, the code itself does what we want. just fixed 3 bugs : ...@@ -13,14 +13,25 @@ First, the code itself does what we want. just fixed 3 bugs :
first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files. first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files.
* tested 1 by 1 seems to come from the N river inputs. but all fields show high values in some specific river mouth, of which some in the Arctic look present very high values (here some example after 5month): * tested 1 by 1 seems to come from the N river inputs. but all fields show high values in some specific river mouth, of which some in the Arctic look present very high values (here some example after 5month):
![image](uploads/4ae4a88ef9ea50f48bcf9726ae1cc339/image.png) ![image](uploads/4ae4a88ef9ea50f48bcf9726ae1cc339/image.png)
![image](uploads/8365eb8f996f74a54eba4e5779ccc533/image.png) ![image](uploads/8365eb8f996f74a54eba4e5779ccc533/image.png)
![image](uploads/301596b4def888b749645a80b1ad8be0/image.png) ![image](uploads/301596b4def888b749645a80b1ad8be0/image.png)
![image](uploads/12c9d88b32ea1aeb96e4fa5baa5ca232/image.png) ![image](uploads/12c9d88b32ea1aeb96e4fa5baa5ca232/image.png)
those results are when using the files : those results are when using the files :
river42_total_ALK_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc * river42_total_ALK_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
river42_total_DIC_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc * river42_total_DIC_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
river42_tot_N_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc * river42_tot_N_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
river42_tot_Si_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc * river42_tot_Si_flux_LS200km_SP10_OBfix_ORCA025.nc
* maybe the we can try with LS 400? here a diff: * maybe the we can try with LS 400? here a diff:
![image](uploads/d3e2a8d4d01e79c10c74ae66dd379eae/image.png) ![image](uploads/d3e2a8d4d01e79c10c74ae66dd379eae/image.png)
Running the LS 400 river nutrients did not solve the problem.
* Andrew added made some special treatment to the Ob fjord in the Russian Arctic.
![image](uploads/62f3d916bf9f95a7df77d6fb66d155b7/image.png)
it didn't Solve the problem.
* I've them re-run the last rivers, spreading the nutrients down to 70m deep (max) instead of 10m earlier.
![image](uploads/b0865550336663aae5a6aa3f711f510b/image.png)
Still no Luck.
* Looking at the bathy, spreading the river nutrients down to 70m won't make a difference in the Arctic...
![image](uploads/95144a1ef30abdeb77be433d63cf03f1/image.png)
As the sea-floor stands between 8 and 15m deep around there...
* Last hope LS400 with special Ob treatment.