... | @@ -100,4 +100,9 @@ first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files |
... | @@ -100,4 +100,9 @@ first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files |
|
* A quick test could be to add the nutrient down to a shallower depth of 10m instead of 70.
|
|
* A quick test could be to add the nutrient down to a shallower depth of 10m instead of 70.
|
|
* we could also strengthen the C security we've added in the C uptake...
|
|
* we could also strengthen the C security we've added in the C uptake...
|
|
I quickly check by changing the river depth. we'll see.
|
|
I quickly check by changing the river depth. we'll see.
|
|
With river, the total production in 1986 is of 31 Pg-C per y still too low for our liking. this will need some tweaking. |
|
With river, the total production in 1986 is of 31 Pg-C per y still too low for our liking. this will need some tweaking.
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
|
* Trying to Understand why it is failing there, in the Chinese sea...
|
|
|
|
* I've tried 1 run with all Andrew's new LS200 files (let's call it `LS200`)
|
|
|
|
* and also 1run where i've switched `DIC` and `ALK` to the widerly spreaded LS400 (so let's call it `LS400`).
|
|
|
|
Both failed. `LS400` few days later though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |