| ... | @@ -43,3 +43,18 @@ first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files |
... | @@ -43,3 +43,18 @@ first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files |
|
|
And Here LS400 just before it failed
|
|
And Here LS400 just before it failed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A solution would be to fill (on top of the Ob river mouth) the other problematic fjords, circled in the last plot. The "filling" is only for the river nutrient flux file creation, not at run time. This way, the nutrients would be released in a better mixed location and avoid the accumulation we see in those fjords. Best would be to use the 200km files made this way.
|
|
A solution would be to fill (on top of the Ob river mouth) the other problematic fjords, circled in the last plot. The "filling" is only for the river nutrient flux file creation, not at run time. This way, the nutrients would be released in a better mixed location and avoid the accumulation we see in those fjords. Best would be to use the 200km files made this way.
|
|
|
|
* New Test with more Fjords filled :
|
|
|
|
Here is the new modified river input (for N and Si) in the Arctic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, it failed... again...
|
|
|
|
Here are some plots :
|
|
|
|
The usual suspects look OK-ish
|
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/48d613d93f438a7a958acbd734575d88/image.png" width=49%>
|
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/a128515612e02de99fb41162a326e1fd/image.png" width=49%>
|
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/43f5d08cded6f7f56869b064fb2e7ac6/image.png" width=49%>
|
|
|
|
<img src="uploads/c858feaceb0cf8493379f59a01a8dc0a/image.png" width=49%>
|
|
|
|
The DIN values are not insane, but this is after 1 month... we might want to fill a tiny bit more in the circled areas
|
|
|
|
Further East another beast : This one looks nasty... it's in the middle of probably quite still waters. would be good to fill this part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last bit of the Arctic looks OK
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
