Skip to content

GitLab

MEDUSA DOCU : Rivers · Changes

Page history
Update MEDUSA DOCU : Rivers authored by julpal's avatar julpal
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 9 additions and 1 deletion
MEDUSA-DOCU-:-Rivers.md
View page @ a914fc29
...@@ -35,3 +35,11 @@ first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files ...@@ -35,3 +35,11 @@ first runs did not work because of something in the newly made river input files
![image](uploads/95144a1ef30abdeb77be433d63cf03f1/image.png) ![image](uploads/95144a1ef30abdeb77be433d63cf03f1/image.png)
As the sea-floor stands between 8 and 15m deep around there... As the sea-floor stands between 8 and 15m deep around there...
* Last hope LS400 with special Ob treatment. * Last hope LS400 with special Ob treatment.
This test ran longer than the 200km version (7month compared to 2) but still, it eventually failed. same problem around the Ob :
![image](uploads/c21513423d741d6ff0251f1c15116183/image.png)
![image](uploads/9f9ef204baee4095bd9536d18a712813/image.png)
![image](uploads/f95e4b982c97f0209fd2a5a862e1d7c8/image.png)
![image](uploads/a26ced6fb1cdcf471fe15601ea9a151a/image.png)
And Here LS400 just before it failed
![image](uploads/07bff8f8c1bd16cebc983a1ead597f16/image.png)
A solution would be to fill (on top of the Ob river mouth) the other problematic fjords, circled in the last plot. The "filling" is only for the river nutrient flux file creation, not at run time. This way, the nutrients would be released in a better mixed location and avoid the accumulation we see in those fjords. Best would be to use the 200km files made this way.